
Tools: Blue Pen
Topic: Nuclear Weapons= World w/o Nuclear Weapons in Allied States
Satisfy - Pronuclear arguments
...Antinuclear advocates exaggerate the dangers of plutonium. After all, the substance is easily safeguarded because it's produced in very small quantities. Furthermore, other dangerous poisons--like lead, which has an infinite half-life--are continually being spewed into the environment.
...Antinuclear activists often complain that the potential damage caused by atomic power isn't covered by any insurance companies. But the reason such businesses haven't insured the industry is simply that they have no actuarial experience on which to base their rates.
...The question of the risks of nuclear power is a deeply technical issue that only well-informed scientists, in that specific field, can understand . . . and the majority of such people support nuclear power.
...Every activity--including driving a car--is risky. It's impossible to have a risk-free society. Consequently the benefits of an action must be weighed against its hazards . . . and nuclear power's benefits outweigh its risks.
Source:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/top10args.html
Topic: Nuclear Weapons= World w/o Nuclear Weapons in Allied States
Action - Info: (against) Movements against Nuclear Weapons/Power
The anti-nuclear movement in the Philippines aimed to stop the construction of nuclear power facilities and terminate the presence of American military bases, which were believed to house nuclear weapons on Philippine soil. Anti-nuclear demonstrations were led by groups such as the Nuclear-Free Philippines Coalition and No Nukes Philippines. A focal point for protests in the late 1970s and 1980s was the proposed Bataan Nuclear power Plant, which was built but never operated. The project was criticized for being a potential threat to public health, especially since the plant was located in an earthquake zone.
The demand of the anti-nuclear movement for the removal of military bases culminated in a 1991 Philippine Senate decision to stop extending the tenure of US facilities in the Philippines. Tons of toxic wastes were left behind after the US withdrawal and anti-nuclear and other groups worked to provide assistance for the bases' cleanup.
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-nuclear_movement_in_the_Philippines
Courtyards were important in Greece as they were the center of family life. The ancient Greeks loved stories and fables. One favorite family activity was to gather in the courtyard to hear these stories, told by the mother or father. In their courtyard, Greek women might relax, chat, and sew. The courtyard was also used as an outdoor dining room.
The courtyards also take up an old Indian architectural motif whereby the courtyard provides light and air for the rooms directly in this hot climate, and people are able to spend time outside or inside according to the time of day. The courtyard is also the classical symbol of something shared, a place where people meet, spend time with each other and live together. This aspect is emphasized in the courtyard for the general public, which is placed immediately inside the entrance. Here people spend their waiting time together almost as if in a state of communal meditation.
Nowadays almost-always present in public areas such as shopping centers or schools, courtyards are still used for outdoor social gatherings and still symbolize "something shared".
=II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II=


The American researchers did an extensive random sampling of the surviving population, asking how large their family was and how many had been killed. From the results it was calculated that 25.5% of the civilian population had been killed. The great unknown, of course, is how large the population was at the time of the explosion. Where the Manhattan Engineer District gave a figure of 255,000--a figure based on the June 1945 rice-ration records, which survived the blast--others have posited 300,000 or even 400,000 including military and "day workers" (the eumphemism of choice for the Korean slave laborers). These populations would not have been shown on the rice-rationing records.
But even if 400,000 people were present in Hiroshima on August 6, the death toll ought not to exceed 102,000, if the American methodology was sound...
Source: http://www.warbirdforum.com/hirodead.htm
North Korea appears to have ramped up its propaganda war against South Korea and the U.S. by turning to Twitter and YouTube – websites that most citizens of the reclusive communist country are banned from viewing.
The North's government-run Uriminzokkiri website posted an announcement last week saying it has a Twitter account and a YouTube channel.
More than 80 videos have been uploaded since July to the global video-sharing site under the user name uriminzokkiri. The series of clips include condemnation of "warmongers" South Korea and the U.S. for blaming North Korea for the sinking of a South Korean warship in March.
"Those who enjoy setting flames of war are bound to burn in those very flames," a narrator says in one video.
A clip titled "Who will win if North Korea and the U.S. fight?" claims the North possesses nuclear fusion technology. North Korea said in May that its scientists succeeded in creating a nuclear fusion reaction, but experts doubt the isolated country actually has made the breakthrough in the elusive clean-energy technology.
Another clip calls the South Korean foreign minister a "pro-American flunky" who should make his living by "mopping the floors of the Pentagon."
The Twitter account, which opened last Thursday under the name uriminzok, which means "our nation" in Korean, has garnered more than 3,000 followers in less than a week.
As of Tuesday uriminzok tweeted 11 links to Uriminzokkiri reports that threaten "merciless retaliation" against South Korea and the U.S. and call South Korean President Lee Myung-bak's administration a "prostitute of the U.S."
Example: Stating that poor performance in schools is caused by poverty; poverty certainly contributes to poor academic performance but it is not the only factor.
Arguing from Ignorance:
Someone argues that a claim is justified simply because its opposite cannot be proven.
Example: A person argues that voucher programs will not harm schools, since no one has ever proven that vouchers have harmed schools.